2025 ADULT 55&Over · Men's 7.0

CROW CANYON CC 55AM7.0A

USTA NorCal · 2025 · 16 players · #3 in subflight

4–6

-6 court diff

Team rating3.43best legal lineup

Court rating3.27avg fielded so far

Schedule3.27avg opponent faced

Standing#3of 3 in subflight

Scout this team →Open the lineup optimizer with this team as your opponent

Roster · 16

Player	Level	Perf	30-day	Record	Singles	Doubles	Bump
MC Mike Canavan	4.0	3.85	−0.02	2–0	—	2–0	—
DM Dennis Mcsweeney	4.0	3.58	—	3–3	—	3–3	—
SH Steve Heninger	3.5	3.42	—	2–1	—	2–1	—
RW Randy Walsten	3.5	3.42	+0.03	2–1	—	2–1	—
CS Craig Schumann	3.5	3.35	—	1–4	—	1–4	—
GP Gary Peer	3.5	3.28	+0.05	1–4	—	1–4	—
GS Greg Sharkey	3.5	3.25	—	1–1	—	1–1	—
LS Lee Slimm	—	3.25	—	0–1	—	0–1	—
DC Dean Christman	3.5	3.24	−0.02	2–1	—	2–1	—
ES Edward Streegan	3.5	3.21	—	0–3	—	0–3	—
CJ Cliff Johnson	3.5	3.18	—	1–4	—	1–4	—
JR John Riley	3.5	3.15	—	1–5	—	1–5	—
PK Paul Krueger	3.5	3.14	—	1–4	—	1–4	—
SC Steve Carmassi	3.5	3.11	−0.03	3–2	—	3–2	—
DK David Kutrosky	3.5	3.02	—	1–2	—	1–2	▼34%3.0
PT Perry Teevens	3.0	2.98	+0.04	3–0	—	3–0	▲32%3.5

Mike Canavan

2–0 · S — · D 2–0

4.0

3.85−0.02

Dennis Mcsweeney

3–3 · S — · D 3–3

4.0

3.58

Steve Heninger

2–1 · S — · D 2–1

3.5

3.42

Randy Walsten

2–1 · S — · D 2–1

3.5

3.42+0.03

Craig Schumann

1–4 · S — · D 1–4

3.5

3.35

Gary Peer

1–4 · S — · D 1–4

3.5

3.28+0.05

Greg Sharkey

1–1 · S — · D 1–1

3.5

3.25

Lee Slimm

0–1 · S — · D 0–1

3.25

Dean Christman

2–1 · S — · D 2–1

3.5

3.24−0.02

Edward Streegan

0–3 · S — · D 0–3

3.5

3.21

Cliff Johnson

1–4 · S — · D 1–4

3.5

3.18

John Riley

1–5 · S — · D 1–5

3.5

3.15

Paul Krueger

1–4 · S — · D 1–4

3.5

3.14

Steve Carmassi

3–2 · S — · D 3–2

3.5

3.11−0.03

David Kutrosky

1–2 · S — · D 1–2

3.5

3.02▼34%

Perry Teevens

3–0 · S — · D 3–0

3.0

2.98+0.04▲32%

Where we win · by court

5–5

3–7

4–6

Standings

1PLEASANTON 55AM7.0A6–4+4 2DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AM7.0A5–5+2 3CROW CANYON CC 55AM7.0A4–6-6

Lineup order

10/10matches fielded in rating order · 100%

A lower line fielding a stronger player or pair than the line above it. Often reflects who was available, not intent — estimated from each player's rating at match time, not an official USTA finding.

Schedule · 10

Mar 29 @ DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AM7.0A	L 1–2
Apr 5 vs PLEASANTON 55AM7.0A	W 2–1
Apr 6 @ PLEASANTON 55AM7.0A	L 1–2
Apr 16 vs DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AM7.0A	L 1–2
Apr 19 @ DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AM7.0A	L 0–3
Apr 27 @ PLEASANTON 55AM7.0A	W 2–1
May 10 @ DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AM7.0A	L 0–3
May 17 vs PLEASANTON 55AM7.0A	W 2–1
May 18 vs PLEASANTON 55AM7.0A	L 0–3
May 21 vs DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AM7.0A	W 3–0