2026 ADULT 65&Over · Women's 7.0

TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC 65AW7.0A

USTA NorCal · 2026 · 19 players · #2 in subflight

6–3

+3 court diff

Team rating3.32best legal lineup

Court rating3.15avg fielded so far

Schedule3.14avg opponent faced

Standing#2of 3 in subflight

Scout this team →Open the lineup optimizer with this team as your opponent

Roster · 19

Player	Level	Perf	30-day	Record	Singles	Doubles	Bump
KE Kathy Emery	4.0	3.72	—	2–1	—	2–1	—
DD Debbie Dea	4.0	3.62	—	0–2	—	0–2	—
SB Sally Brien	4.0	3.57	+0.01	2–1	—	2–1	—
LS Lizanne Suter	3.5	3.33	−0.03	2–1	—	2–1	—
SF Sally Fay	3.5	3.33	—	2–1	—	2–1	—
MR Meyla Ruwin	3.5	3.29	+0.08	2–0	—	2–0	—
VS Vicky Simonds	3.5	3.29	—	1–1	—	1–1	—
MT Midori Tanaka Atkins	3.5	3.27	—	3–0	—	3–0	—
RT Ruthanne Tatum	3.5	3.24	—	2–1	—	2–1	—
KF Karen Forsthoff	3.5	3.21	−0.01	3–0	—	3–0	—
JB Janet Broude	3.5	3.14	—	1–1	—	1–1	—
TS Teresa Shaw	3.5	3.08	—	2–1	—	2–1	—
RM Risa Meyer	3.5	3.06	—	1–2	—	1–2	▼23%3.0
MA Mary Anne Ruyle	3.5	3.04	−0.06	1–2	—	1–2	▼21%3.0
LA Lois Anne Indorf	3.5	3.01	−0.01	1–2	—	1–2	▼39%3.0
MH Maimi Hom	3.5	2.95	—	0–2	—	0–2	—
CP Carrie Pomerantz	3.0	2.94	−0.01	3–1	—	3–1	▲11%3.5
KC Kay Christenson	3.0	2.73	—	2–3	—	2–3	—
JC Jeri Chu	3.0	2.49	—	0–2	—	0–2	▼54%2.5

Kathy Emery

2–1 · S — · D 2–1

4.0

3.72

Debbie Dea

0–2 · S — · D 0–2

4.0

3.62

Sally Brien

2–1 · S — · D 2–1

4.0

3.57+0.01

Lizanne Suter

2–1 · S — · D 2–1

3.5

3.33−0.03

Sally Fay

2–1 · S — · D 2–1

3.5

3.33

Meyla Ruwin

2–0 · S — · D 2–0

3.5

3.29+0.08

Vicky Simonds

1–1 · S — · D 1–1

3.5

3.29

Midori Tanaka Atkins

3–0 · S — · D 3–0

3.5

3.27

Ruthanne Tatum

2–1 · S — · D 2–1

3.5

3.24

Karen Forsthoff

3–0 · S — · D 3–0

3.5

3.21−0.01

Janet Broude

1–1 · S — · D 1–1

3.5

3.14

Teresa Shaw

2–1 · S — · D 2–1

3.5

3.08

Risa Meyer

1–2 · S — · D 1–2

3.5

3.06▼23%

Mary Anne Ruyle

1–2 · S — · D 1–2

3.5

3.04−0.06▼21%

Lois Anne Indorf

1–2 · S — · D 1–2

3.5

3.01−0.01▼39%

Maimi Hom

0–2 · S — · D 0–2

3.5

2.95

Carrie Pomerantz

3–1 · S — · D 3–1

3.0

2.94−0.01▲11%

Kay Christenson

2–3 · S — · D 2–3

3.0

2.73

Jeri Chu

0–2 · S — · D 0–2

3.0

2.49▼54%

Where we win · by court

8–1

2–7

5–4

Standings

1MARIN TC 65AW7.0A6–3+5 2TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC 65AW7.0A6–3+3 3MT TAM RC 65AW7.0A2–8-8

Lineup order

9/9matches fielded in rating order · 100%

A lower line fielding a stronger player or pair than the line above it. Often reflects who was available, not intent — estimated from each player's rating at match time, not an official USTA finding.

Schedule · 12

Feb 9 @ MT TAM RC 65AW7.0A	W 2–1
Feb 23 @ MT TAM RC 65AW7.0A	Scheduled
Mar 2 @ MT TAM RC 65AW7.0A	W 2–1
Mar 3 vs MT TAM RC 65AW7.0A	L 1–2
Mar 10 vs MARIN TC 65AW7.0A	W 3–0
Mar 11 @ MARIN TC 65AW7.0A	L 0–3
Mar 16 vs MARIN TC 65AW7.0A	W 2–1
Mar 20 @ MARIN TC 65AW7.0A	L 1–2
Mar 23 @ MT TAM RC 65AW7.0A	W 2–1
Apr 7 vs MT TAM RC 65AW7.0A	W 2–1
Apr 9 vs MARIN TC 65AW7.0A	Scheduled
Apr 13 vs MARIN TC 65AW7.0A	Scheduled