2026 ADULT 55&Over · Women's 8.0

FOUNTAINGROVE-AC 55AW8.0A

USTA NorCal · 2026 · 12 players · #4 in subflight

0–10

-22 court diff

Team rating3.63best legal lineup

Court rating3.50avg fielded so far

Schedule3.72avg opponent faced

Standing#4of 4 in subflight

Scout this team →Open the lineup optimizer with this team as your opponent

Roster · 12

Player	Level	Perf	30-day	Record	Singles	Doubles	Bump
TM Theresa Martinez	4.0	3.94	—	3–3	—	3–3	—
GA Geri Amaral	4.0	3.91	—	1–2	—	1–2	—
CW Carol Wood	4.0	3.64	—	2–2	—	2–2	—
KV Kim Valerga	4.0	3.61	−0.03	0–6	—	0–6	—
NC Natalie Cosentino Manning	4.0	3.55	−0.01	0–6	—	0–6	▼14%3.5
MS Mary Schwank	4.0	3.52	+0.03	0–6	—	0–6	▼31%3.5
NW Nichelle Watkins	4.0	3.46	−0.01	0–3	—	0–3	▼77%3.5
JM Judith Mattingly	3.5	3.45	—	0–2	—	0–2	▲15%4.0
GK Ginger Kelly	3.5	3.24	+0.05	0–2	—	0–2	—
TG Teri Giusti-Cobb	3.5	3.23	+0.05	0–3	—	0–3	—
PK Patricia Krickl	3.5	2.99	−0.01	0–2	—	0–2	—
TD Tiffany Dinardo	3.5	2.86	—	0–5	—	0–5	▼100%3.0

Theresa Martinez

3–3 · S — · D 3–3

4.0

3.94

Geri Amaral

1–2 · S — · D 1–2

4.0

3.91

Carol Wood

2–2 · S — · D 2–2

4.0

3.64

Kim Valerga

0–6 · S — · D 0–6

4.0

3.61−0.03

Natalie Cosentino Manning

0–6 · S — · D 0–6

4.0

3.55−0.01▼14%

Mary Schwank

0–6 · S — · D 0–6

4.0

3.52+0.03▼31%

Nichelle Watkins

0–3 · S — · D 0–3

4.0

3.46−0.01▼77%

Judith Mattingly

0–2 · S — · D 0–2

3.5

3.45▲15%

Ginger Kelly

0–2 · S — · D 0–2

3.5

3.24+0.05

Teri Giusti-Cobb

0–3 · S — · D 0–3

3.5

3.23+0.05

Patricia Krickl

0–2 · S — · D 0–2

3.5

2.99−0.01

Tiffany Dinardo

0–5 · S — · D 0–5

3.5

2.86▼100%

Where we win · by court

3–7

0–10

0–4

Standings

1NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW8.0A9–1+22 2PETALUMA TA/CASA GRANDE HS 55AW8.0A6–4-2 3LA CANTERA RC 55AW8.0A5–5+2 4FOUNTAINGROVE-AC 55AW8.0A0–10-22

Lineup order

9/10matches fielded in rating order · 90% · 1 out of order

Apr 26 vs LA CANTERA RC 55AW8.0A

D2 3.48 outrated D1 3.21+0.26

Mary Schwank / Judith Mattingly at D2 · Natalie Cosentino Manning / Tiffany Dinardo at D1

A lower line fielding a stronger player or pair than the line above it. Often reflects who was available, not intent — estimated from each player's rating at match time, not an official USTA finding.

Schedule · 10

Mar 21 @ LA CANTERA RC 55AW8.0A	L 0–3
Mar 26 vs NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW8.0A	L 1–2
Apr 16 @ NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW8.0A	L 0–3
Apr 22 vs LA CANTERA RC 55AW8.0A	L 0–3
Apr 26 @ LA CANTERA RC 55AW8.0A	L 0–3
Apr 29 vs PETALUMA TA/CASA GRANDE HS 55AW8.0A	L 1–2
May 3 @ PETALUMA TA/CASA GRANDE HS 55AW8.0A	L 1–2
May 13 vs PETALUMA TA/CASA GRANDE HS 55AW8.0A	L 1–2
May 20 vs NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW8.0A	L 0–3
May 24 @ LA CANTERA RC 55AW8.0A	L 0–3